Uber, Lyft, DoorDash Workers won’t get Full Employee Rights Under California Court Ruling (2024)

by CalMattersJuly 27, 2024, 10:36 am550 Views

Uber, Lyft, DoorDash Workers won’t get Full Employee Rights Under California Court Ruling (2)

By Levi Sumagaysay,CalMatters

In a major victory for gig-work companies, the California Supreme Court today upheld a voter-approved law that allows Uber and other app makers to treat their drivers and delivery workers as independent contractors instead of employees.The decision on Proposition 22 was unanimous. Approved by 58% of California voters in 2020 and enacted the same year, Prop. 22 gave app-based gig workers some benefits but not full worker protections because the ballot initiative — which gig companies spent more than $200 million to pass — ensures they are not considered employees.

More than 1.4 million Californians are app-based gig workers for companies such as Uber, Lyft, DoorDash and Instacart, according to the industry’s latest estimates.

The court was not considering the pros and cons of the gig economy. During oral arguments in May in San Francisco, justices zeroed in on whether Prop. 22 was incompatible with California law, which gives the Legislature responsibility over a complete workers’ compensation system. By declaring gig workers independent contractors, Prop 22 made them ineligible for workers’ comp benefits. SEIU California, the Service Employees International Union that had sought to overturn the law on behalf of four gig workers, argued that this made the law unconstitutional.

Prop. 22 “does not preclude the electorate from exercising its initiative power to legislate on matters affecting workers’ compensation,” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote.

Advocates for gig workers said the ruling was a blow.

“This is a really tragic outcome,” said Veena Dubal, a law professor at UC Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality. “But it’s not the end of the road.” Dubal speculated that labor advocates could put together a proposition of their own, or municipalities and the state could adopt ordinances and laws that are more worker-friendly —such as making it illegal to set different wages for similar work based on algorithmic formulas.

Gig companies backed Prop. 22 in 2020 to win themselves an exclusion from a new state law known as Assembly Bill 5, which would have upended their business models by requiring them to consider their drivers and delivery workers as employees. Last month, Uber lost a legal battle to overturn AB 5 — meaning only Prop. 22 stood in the way of forcing ride-hailing and delivery app companies to comply with it.

Under Prop. 22, gig workers are promised guaranteed minimum earnings of 120% of minimum wage, health care stipends, occupational accident insurance and accidental death insurance. Many of the benefits come with stipulations:

  • The guaranteed earnings are based on time on a “gig” and don’t include time workers spend waiting for a ride or delivery.
  • The health care stipends are for certain eligible workers only, excluding those who qualify for public assistance, including Medi-Cal.
  • The occupational accident insurance has a $1 million limit
  • Gig workers are reimbursed for their mileage, although at less than the IRS-mandated rate employees receive — currently 35 cents a mile vs. 67 cents a mile. But this amount is included in the minimum earnings guarantee —it is not in addition to it.
  • Because Prop. 22 will stand, app-based platform workers will continue to be ineligible for benefits such as sick pay, a minimum wage for all time worked, unemployment insurance and more.

A group representing the gig companies did not immediately comment. A lawyer for the gig companies, Kurt Oneto, in May called the legal issue before the court “pretty straightforward,” arguing that the law that gave the Legislature sweeping power over worker’s comp was “only enacted to prevent courts from invalidating workers’ comp” — not to limit voters’ power over it.

Gig workers vowed not to give up.

“We’ll continue to fight until we have justice for drivers and all workers,” said Nicole Moore, president of Los Angeles-based Rideshare Drivers United. Moore added that this ruling could mean “app companies are coming for all of our jobs, whether it’s in health care, construction, entertainment.”

Uber, Lyft, DoorDash Workers won’t get Full Employee Rights Under California Court Ruling (3)

This article was originally published byCalMatters.

Written by CalMatters

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics. (Articles are published in partnership with edhat.com)

What do you think?

3 Points

Upvote Downvote

Uber, Lyft, DoorDash Workers won’t get Full Employee Rights Under California Court Ruling (5)

Comments

0 Comments deleted by Administrator

Leave a Review or Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Uber, Lyft, DoorDash Workers won’t get Full Employee Rights Under California Court Ruling (2024)

FAQs

Uber, Lyft, DoorDash Workers won’t get Full Employee Rights Under California Court Ruling? ›

In a major victory for gig-work companies, the California Supreme Court today upheld a voter-approved law that allows Uber and other app makers to treat their drivers and delivery workers as independent contractors instead of employees. The decision on Proposition 22 was unanimous.

What did the Supreme Court rule on Uber in California? ›

California Supreme Court Unanimously Rules that Uber, Lyft Drivers May Remain Classified as Independent Contractors. On July 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Uber Technologies Inc. (“Uber”) and Lyft Inc. (“Lyft”) can continue classifying their California drivers as independent contractors.

Did Uber Lyft and others win California ruling to treat drivers as contractors? ›

Passed by voters in 2020, the ballot measure classifies drivers of ride-hailing apps as independent contractors rather than as employees. The California Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to uphold a four-year-old ballot measure that classifies Uber and Lyft drivers as independent contractors rather than as employees.

Will Uber and Lyft drivers remain contractors in California? ›

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that app-based ride-hailing and delivery services like Uber and Lyft can continue treating their drivers as independent contractors rather than employees. The unanimous decision by the state's top court is a big win for tech giants.

What is the Uber lawsuit for drivers in California? ›

Uber recently agreed to pay $8.4 million to settle a class-action lawsuit with California drivers who claimed they were misclassified as independent contractors, rather than employees.

What is the California gig worker law? ›

A 2020 California law compels businesses to offer employment benefits to more workers rather than treating them like independent contractors. Uber lost an effort to overturn the law.

Why are Uber drivers not employees? ›

In California, a law is upheld that classifies Uber drivers as contractors rather than employees. The ruling is a victory for ride-share firms and food-delivery app platforms as the law designates drivers as self-employed, meaning they do not have the right to some regular employee benefits.

Are Uber Eats drivers considered employees in California? ›

Uber drivers in California are independent contractors, not employees.

What is the AB5 law? ›

California Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) extends employee classification status to some gig workers. Under AB5, companies must use a three-pronged test to prove workers are independent contractors, not employees. 1. AB5 was designed to regulate companies that hire gig workers in large numbers, such as Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash.

What did the court rule in Meyer v Uber? ›

In that matter, the court enforced Uber's Terms of Service, explaining that notice of the Terms of Service were reasonably conspicuous to consumers, and manifestation of assent was unambiguous.

How much do you get paid in California for Uber? ›

Average Uber Driver hourly pay in California is approximately $22.58, which is 28% above the national average.

What is the Uber misclassification lawsuit? ›

In 2017, Lyft settled a $27-million class action lawsuit brought by drivers who sought to be classified as employees. In July 2022, Uber settled a class-action lawsuit with California drivers who claimed they were misclassified as independent contractors rather than employees, agreeing to pay $8.4 million.

Who regulates Uber in California? ›

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has passed laws for the operation of a TNC within the state. These laws involve the following: Licensing, permit and certification requirements. Mandatory Lyft and/or Uber decals on a vehicle's front and back passenger-side windshields.

References

Top Articles
Sportpark Lahr, Lahr/Schwarzwald: Stunden, Preis und Meinungen
Balk.MediSport, Lahr/Schwarzwald: Stunden, Preis und Meinungen
Spasa Parish
The Machine 2023 Showtimes Near Habersham Hills Cinemas
Gilbert Public Schools Infinite Campus
Rentals for rent in Maastricht
159R Bus Schedule Pdf
11 Best Sites Like The Chive For Funny Pictures and Memes
Finger Lakes 1 Police Beat
Craigslist Pets Huntsville Alabama
Paulette Goddard | American Actress, Modern Times, Charlie Chaplin
Red Dead Redemption 2 Legendary Fish Locations Guide (“A Fisher of Fish”)
What's the Difference Between Halal and Haram Meat & Food?
Rugged Gentleman Barber Shop Martinsburg Wv
Jennifer Lenzini Leaving Ktiv
Havasu Lake residents boiling over water quality as EPA assumes oversight
Justified - Streams, Episodenguide und News zur Serie
Epay. Medstarhealth.org
Olde Kegg Bar & Grill Portage Menu
Half Inning In Which The Home Team Bats Crossword
Amazing Lash Bay Colony
Cato's Dozen Crossword
Cyclefish 2023
What’s Closing at Disney World? A Complete Guide
New from Simply So Good - Cherry Apricot Slab Pie
Ohio State Football Wiki
Find Words Containing Specific Letters | WordFinder®
FirstLight Power to Acquire Leading Canadian Renewable Operator and Developer Hydromega Services Inc. - FirstLight
Webmail.unt.edu
When Is Moonset Tonight
Metro By T Mobile Sign In
Restored Republic December 1 2022
Dl 646
Apple Watch 9 vs. 10 im Vergleich: Unterschiede & Neuerungen
12 30 Pacific Time
Operation Carpe Noctem
Nail Supply Glamour Lake June
Anmed My Chart Login
No Compromise in Maneuverability and Effectiveness
Adventhealth Employee Handbook 2022
Mvsu Canvas
Teamnet O'reilly Login
Infinity Pool Showtimes Near Maya Cinemas Bakersfield
Dermpathdiagnostics Com Pay Invoice
A look back at the history of the Capital One Tower
Alvin Isd Ixl
Maria Butina Bikini
Busted Newspaper Zapata Tx
Rubrankings Austin
2045 Union Ave SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49507 | Estately 🧡 | MLS# 24048395
Upgrading Fedora Linux to a New Release
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Delena Feil

Last Updated:

Views: 5595

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Delena Feil

Birthday: 1998-08-29

Address: 747 Lubowitz Run, Sidmouth, HI 90646-5543

Phone: +99513241752844

Job: Design Supervisor

Hobby: Digital arts, Lacemaking, Air sports, Running, Scouting, Shooting, Puzzles

Introduction: My name is Delena Feil, I am a clean, splendid, calm, fancy, jolly, bright, faithful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.